This really is an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an old thread. You should look at developing a new thread.
I decided to combination the load facts shown on 6mmBR.com for different cartridges, to discover how over and over each form of primer was referenced. I chose 6mmBR.com, to get a couple of reasons:
Ah hah! That explains why the Speer manual, during the entrance part covering reloading history and subjects, only talks about CCI and Federal primers as if no other brands exist!
If firing pin Strength is at or earlier mentioned the brink, the primer will detonate reliably and deliver the maximum intended ignition amount. Point is ... primer flash will not be at its comprehensive opportunity till firing pin Power meets or exceeds the sensitivity threshold. With rifles, This is certainly seldom a difficulty due to the fact there is often a really sturdy firing pin strike. Armed forces rifle ammo has "desensitized" primers to circumvent slam fires but most primers made for the civilian marketplace are usually not desensitized.
I've viewed some movement currently in price tag (sales on primers at many of the normal suspect retail resources). I believe the approaching recession will very likely drive that movement even farther as the average purchaser starts to pull in their horns.
I do not recall the details, but there is supposedly only one position in the US that procedures powder for primers. They had A significant fire two years back.
Have also found they exhibit tension signals sooner than the opposite's. This isn't a "quantum leap" distinction, just see the "softness" when seating them. The Remington small pistol primers also give a similiar experience, mabe not as pronounced.
I assume if I'd to choose a model ... it would be Winchester. They feed just high-quality in my Dillon RL550 While CCIs Will not. The skirts on CCI primers are only rough adequate the place they do not favor computerized primer feeders and jam. When I load on my single phase RCBS Rockchucker, it doesn't make Significantly variation.
The 1 caveat on That is if you turn from a standard to the magnum primer, and It truly is recommended that you again from the charge.
Now I do use primer flatness for a tutorial for Once i am obtaining a very little carried absent, so Which may be a difficulty. We'll see within the 9mm.
Not to hijack this thread but a pal of mine that provides ammunition implies the Federal 210M federal 215 primers 100 count primer. Why, I don't know as he was making an attempt not to present me proprietary facts. I'll use the Lee Hand Priming Software Once i get close to to using the Feds. Ken, the box is baaaaad.
The man that answered the telephone understood exactly what was taking place, just before I even said what primer was being used.
That’s an awesome issue, Ted. I’m not sure. Here's a few examples of what I’ve read in different areas around the Federal 210 vs Federal 210M dissimilarities:
Federal primer cups are smooth. I do not know if it would make any difference in handguns, but they are not suggested to be used in a Garand.